Fantasia: The Early Risk

Fantasia was released in 1940, following the successes of Walt Disney’s beloved Mickey Mouse, Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, and Pinocchio. It is a story combination of stunning animation that is complimented with as one would consider elites scores.

With his name established, Walt had other plans to pursue. With Fantasia, Disney hoped to achieve something else. Something greater. He once told his staff, “we’ve got more in this medium than making people laugh.” The new film, he said, would “change the history of motion pictures.” And despite its initial box-office failure and high criticisms, Fantasia grew to be one of Disney’s greatest creations in getting audiences to view animation in a different art medium. A respected one.

Now, mentioned above, why would someone believe the music in this particular film to be elites? Well, all the scores are classical pieces. With the rise of classical music during the renaissance, it has been heavily believed that the classics were made exclusively for the higher class and the educated. However, I believe Walt had no intentions for exclusivity and hoped for new listeners to experience classical music in a different way. The film was being developed just in the year before World War II, already taking a big risk for and early Disney movie. Having a film with animated visuals to complement classical scores was not exactly what audiences were expecting from young Walt Disney’s work history.

After Fantasia’s release, there were many mixed reviews. It was even considered to be a box-office failure. Before the movie’s release, Disney devised a first-of-its-kind, surround-sound system he called Fantasound, to be installed in first-run theaters. Disney imagined adding new segments in the future, so the film could be released again and again. But Fantasound turned out to be too expensive to install in every theater. The film had to be substantially cut. After early critical enthusiasm, NewYork Times even calling it a” delightful and exciting” creation, audiences seemed baffled or bored by it. It lost more than the modern equivalent of $15 million and nearly drove the company into bankruptcy.

Many were amazed by the advancement in using Fantasound in earlier theaters only. However, many others were also appalled by the visuals. It was deemed even as a far as wild and brutalizing. I believe it was greatly criticized merely from the fact that the audiences were expecting films such as Pinocchio and Snow White again. But many at the time seemed to not understand the actual significance of the tools used in creating the story, making it a great film and in fact very similar to Snow White.

The combination of classical music and vibrant and bouncy visuals create a sense of fantastical realism. It is the same pattern that Walt has done within Snow White and MGM’s The Wizard of Oz. Walt always knew that in order to change the value of animation as an art form, the audience first needed to be grounded into the story and characters while also enjoying the lively art animation was supposed to be. Just how Walt brought realism to Snow White’s features and life struggles and just how Victor Fleming wrote deep relatable themes in the relationship of Dorothy’s friend group, bridging the “elites” classical music to playful animated characters helped ground the genre of animation and allowed all classes and social groups to experience, essentially animated classical music in a new way.

The movie itself did not bring Disney to the high class status Walt Disney was hoping for but it opened a long bridge of utilizing classical music within animated pictures for generations to come.

Sources:

https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/922891.pdf?ab_segments=0%252Fdefault-2%252Fcontrol&refreqid=excelsior%3A69b82aeb1bae6f3166e18a1141fe02bd

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/disney-fantasia-critical-box-office-failure-180956963/

Soviet Montage Definition

The Soviet Montage is the practice of editing certain film clips or even photos together to send a specific message.  This technique however was used for a very short amount of time.  It lasted from 1924 until 1930 and only about 30 films have been made using this technique.

This method of filming came about after the Russian revolution in 1917.  The filmers were low on supplies like film so they started experimenting with films that were used in earlier projects.

The man that was at the forefront of inventing this technique was Lev Kuleshov.  He carried out an experiment where he would show the same picture of a woman paired with various images of food or something sad.  He found that the viewers opinion of the woman’s facial features changed based off whatever picture was being shown with it.  The viewers were unaware that the photo of the woman was the same in all pairings and their perspective was simply warped by the use of the other picture.

Sergei Eisenstein was a filmmaker best known for using Soviet montage.  The reason for this is he wanted to spread propaganda that people didn’t need to be able to read in order to understand it.  He wanted to “harness the emotion of the Russian people and lead them towards a new revolutionized society.”  An example of this is his film October which was done in 1927.  Eisenstein wanted to portray how he viewed religion and culture.  He did this by connecting different religious scenes, one after another, until they began to blend together and gave off the notion that “all religion is the same”.

Sergei also used Soviet montage to distort the viewers perception of what was happening during a certain event.  In his film Battleship Potemkin in 1925 he took a scene that in reality only lasted a couple of minutes and he altered the films so that it would seem to take seven minutes instead.  Therefore changing the audience’s perception of what is actually happening and what’s just an illusion.

While the use of Soviet montage isn’t a regular thing there are newer movies that have utilized this technique.  One example of this is the movie Rocky from 1976.  There’s a montage of Rocky training for his upcoming boxing match.  The scene shows him running long distances, punching things, running up stairs, all while a song is playing about working hard and getting strong.  This editing method was used in this case to portray Rocky’s determination in his training for the big fight.  It also shows a decent amount of time passing without the viewer having to actually sit through hours of film.

All in all Soviet montage was important in its time because it led to historical revisionism in a time where a fascist leader demanded socialist realism.  It also created a form of propaganda that could be used to reach even illiterate people in a simple way.

Without Soviet montage theory, it would be more challenging for directors to get across their intended message or tone of the film. As stated earlier, Soviet montage is used in the movie Rocky while he is training for his fight but without the inspirational music playing in the background, the clips of him training would not have the same effect. Soviet montage is important to cinema because without it, directors would not be able to display on film what they may be imagining in their head without the right tone or context.

https://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1011&context=hst_theses (Links to an external site.)

http://warrior-fighter.blogspot.com (Links to an external site.)

https://filmstudies.info/terminology/manuscripts/soviet-montague.html

The God Father, Does it Live Up to The Hype?

The Godfather is an American crime film from 1972.  It was directed by Francis Ford Coppola and won a total of four Academy Awards such as “Best Picture” and “Best Actor” in regards to Marlon Brando (Geeks).  The story itself is set in 1945 New York and follows the Corleone family. The Corleone family is made up of quite a few Sicilian mobsters and the dad, Vito Corleone, is the famous “Godfather”.  

 

The opening scene of The Godfather is the day of his daughters wedding, where it’s tradition to not turn down any requests.  It shows The Godfather in his office talking to various men about their troubles and really gives you an idea to just how powerful he is.  At one point it showed a man sitting by himself during the celebration of The Godfather’s daughter’s wedding and he was just practicing his introduction and thank you to The Godfather over and over; he was so nervous about the meeting that he didn’t seem to even notice the bystanders that were watching him with concern.

At first the protagonist seemed to be The Godfather as that is the title of the movie and that was the focus in the beginning of the film.  However, at some point during a feud with another Italian family Vito Corleone is shot and hospitalized. While he is laid up in the hospital, unable to defend himself, another mobster plans an attack on him and orchestrates it with the local police.  Michael Corleone, The Godfather’s son, shows up at the hospital just at the right time and saves his father from being murdered. From that point on the protagonist becomes Michael and the plot is about his rise to being the head of the family company as well as a vicious mob boss — arguably more ruthless than his father.

 

There’s one goal in the movie and that’s power.  There are 6 powerful families that are referenced and always seem to be taking pot shots at each other.  One family would act, the other would retaliate, wash, rinse, and repeat. While that’s a very basic overview of the goal at hand, there’s a reason the film won the awards that it did, it’s very good.

 

The production of The Godfather was very interesting to me.  Coppola estimated that the first film was made using around 6.5 million dollars.  Coppola also said that today a studio probably wouldn’t be willing to take a risk on The Godfather the way they did back in 1972.  Another interesting tidbit is that Al Pacino, the actor that played Michael Corleone, wasn’t really wanted for the part. The Paramount studio executive, Bob Evans, didn’t want to use Al Pacino as he felt he was too short for the character.  This led to Al Pacino auditioning for the same part over and over because Coppola really wanted him but Bob Evans did not (nofilmschool).

 

The actors in the movie were both well known stars and lesser known stars.  Marlon Brando was already an iconic actor, but that came with some consequences.  The president of the studio absolutely did not want Marlon Brando to be a part of the production and in an attempt to dissuade Coppola he said that Brando would have to put up a million dollar bond stating that he wouldn’t cause any problems during the production (nofilmschool).  Coppola accepted with no hesitation and didn’t tell Brando about the interesting deal. Brando ended up knocking it out of the park. Al Pacino and Robert Duvall were both somewhat new to Hollywood and The Godfather seemed to launch them into fame (geeks).

 

The special effects for the movie were pretty cut and dry.  I felt like they did a good job with fight scenes or shooting scenes.  One interesting thing I found about the film, however, is that they had to make two different sets of prints with varying light levels.  When this movie was released it was really popular to go to drive in movie theaters and to prevent the image from being too dark because it’s nighttime during the showing the producers would go overboard and overlight everything.  They made the darker films for theaters. I just found it interesting how much thought goes into the little details of the movie. Lighting isn’t something I would normally take into consideration, however, I do know that when a movie’s lighting is off it makes me not want to watch the movie altogether.

 

The overwhelming majority of reviews of The Godfather all said that the movie was excellent; after watching the film for myself, I can agree with that statement!  

 

https://www.tested.com/art/movies/463501-filming-light-and-dark-side-godfather/

 

https://geeks.media/the-godfather-film-review-and-analysis

 

https://nofilmschool.com/2017/05/godfather-production-cast-reunion-panel

 

https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-godfather-1972

 

Star Wars Great Film

Image result for star wars a new hope

          My experience of Star Wars: episode IV was one that I did not expect to endure. Usually I am not into the sci-fi, intergalactic type of movies as I had never seen any of the Star Wars movies before. Anyways, my experience was that this was a really exciting movie that is action packed with a great plot and story line. And you can see how this first movie unfolded the path for the success that the series has gone down and still continues to go down now a days. This movie is the second highest grossing movie of all time not only in the US but also Canada. So as you can tell we aren’t the only ones that feel like the Star Wars movies are some of the best ideas ever came up with. When I watched the first movie I definitely didn’t expect to be so locked in and interested in a movie that was based off so much science fiction, but you really have no choice. After watching the first movie I felt as if I had no choice but to continue watching the series just to keep up and know what happened next. 

           A very significant scene in Star Wars was when obi’wan became one with the force. In the entire movie you hear them talking about the force , like the force this, and the force that. Then when he was struck down by Darth Vader his body disappeared instead of being cut in half, which was the first time the force had actually been proven. The force was talked about by the good and evil people in the movies but ultimately the force never really was shown to be a real thing. Another very important moment in the film was when the destruction of Alderaan occurred. This is the first example of the death star being used. The death star was like a huge ball, no bigger than the moon, that had a crater in it and was used to shoot lasers out and destroy planets. The last but certainly not least moment that I found to be very significant in the film was when Luke turns off his targeting computers and uses the force to manually launch the torpedoes in the exhaust port of the death star, at obi’wan’s request. I feel as if there are too many great moments in the movie to really pinpoint just a couple significant times so I randomly chose 3 just to show how good the scenes in the movie really were.

          Anyone I’ve ever talked to about Star Wars either tell me that they really love it and have seen every single episode, or that they’ve never had the opportunity to really get in the movies. The people who haven’t seen Star Wars usually have a pretty negative opinion on the movie and on the people that watch it. I’ve heard multiple people call people who have watched Star Wars either nerds, lowlifes, or anything else they can think of just to justified to themselves that’s it’s ok that they haven’t had the chance to witness such an experience of science fiction. Anyone I have talked to that has seen Star Wars is simply addicted and are always talking about how they can’t wait to see the next episode coming out. 

          On a technical level I really enjoyed the media and visuals they took the time to put inside of this film. I know it took a whole lot of editing to have to create and entire sequence of movies that all took place in outer space. I would definitely say this this is considered one of the greatest movies of all time and never will lose that title. Even after watching ET and King Kong I was amazed on how great the edits and special effects in the movie were. This movie was released in 1977 and I know it took more than 2 and a half years to get this movie completely produced and finished. So yes, there are films out there that are considered great films, but unfortunately don’t live up to their name. Good for George Lucas, Star Wars doesn’t fall until the overrated category like the rest of the so call “Great Movies” that aren’t really that great. In actuality, this series of movies has been getting greater and greater as time has been passing, technology getting greater, and George Lucas (the director) getting smarter.

sources:

https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Star_Wars:_Episode_IV_A_New_Hope

https://www.metacritic.com/movie/star-wars-episode-iv—a-new-hope

https://www.lucasfilm.com/productions/episode-iv/

Late Spring by Yasujiro Ozu

The film I watched is one of the most representative works of Yasujiro Ozu, which is named Late Spring. One of Ozu’s writing features is telling a flat story but reflecting a profound truth. The story told in this film is happened between a single father and his sole daughter. After the early death of her mother, Ji Zi, the daughter in the story, stick together with her father and help each other in difficulties, and both of them are reluctant to marry firstly, but at the end of the film Ji Zi married someone because of her father’s white lie, leaving her father spend the left time of life alone. I am deeply moved by the great affection between the father and the daughter. Actually, we can say that the greatest affection among human beings is the love between parents and their children, so this film is of illuminating influence for me to handle my relations with my parents.

 

 

As for the impressive moments or scenes in the film, I was deeply moved by the moment that the father cheated Ji Zi that he decided to remarry someone and persuade Ji Zi to pursuit her own happiness, by which the daughter could begin a new life frankly. Actually, all of our audiences know that it is a white lie or just an excuse of her father, which aims to not to delay the future of Ji Zi. What’s more, the flat conversations occurred many times in the film between the father and daughter also enlighten me a lot. In the film, Ji Zi more than once expressed her determination to accompany her father all the time and never marry someone, but at the end of the film, with the persuasion from her father, she finally gave up her obsession. But indeed it was a kind of great love and responsibility as a child and the only partner of the old man in the world.

There are also some critical voices about the film. As audiences find, most of Ozu’s films are about the misfortunes in a family and some are about the topic that daughters refuse to get married and leave the family. Some may regard this is not a positive topic and the consistent techniques used in his film are dull frames, still scenes and inconspicuous sound effects, which are not encouraging and attractive for the audience. But my opinion is the opposite, it is the simpleness of the story and scenes that bring up a great and thought-provoking work. The common topics between parents and their children are also a light spot of his works, which is an everlasting issue in the world.

The excellence and success of the film Late Spring is definite. First, Ozu has a unique shooting character and a special way to tell a story to his audiences. Also, his success is due to the details of his emotional processing and hidden principles. What’s more, it is the emotional resonance with most audiences that make his works famous and valuable. So, we can find that most of the great films are successful for their unique detail processing techniques and the historical and practical significance for people’s life in modern society.

Sources

https://film.avclub.com/yasujiro-ozu-s-quietly-staggering-late-spring-returns-i-1798186831

 

King Kong Great film

         The movie King Kong is definitely one of the top 50 movies ever made in America. I love how the movie shows a clear meaning to what they want people to believe it’s like, but there is also a deeper meaning behind it. Kong is set to resemble a terrifying creature sitting on an island waiting to create mass destruction to anyone or anything that comes in his direction. Little do they know, Kong actually has a good heart and isn’t out to terrorize but really to mind his own business. I definitely feel like the deeper meaning to King Kong is to show human greed and how they will stop at nothing to get what they wanted. 

          One of the moments that really stood out to me was when kong first fell in love with Ann and how his love for her led him to do things he’d never even think about doing. For example Kong fought off dinosaurs in desperation to keep his love safe. Another really significant moment in the film was when they had Kong chained up inside of the theatre in order for the people with cameras to come in and take pictures of him and really harass him to full extent. The final but certainly not least significant moment of the film was when Kong had fallen from the top of the Empire State Building to his death after fighting off multiple fighter pilots with Ann inside of his hands. This was the final scene of the movie and certainly one of the most important. 

Image result for king kong

          Although the movies graphics weren’t the best I still found them very good and impressive for a movie made in 1933. There were many other movies around this time that didn’t use special effects not nearly as well as they did while creating King Kong. The deeper meaning behind this movie made me appreciate the film for much more than just the visuals, but along with the dialogue and the events they used to build up to the climax of the movie. One of the reviews spoke on how you’d watch the movie and keep in mind that this 65 foot gorilla is not only fake as can be, but hard to believe any of the events he was doing were even possible. Even still, people watch this movie and are filled with excitement and enjoyment seeing the amazing things this huge animal is capable of doing. The art of imagination is really played with in this film and I am yet to see someone watch this movie and complain about how fake it is or how scenarios like this will never come true. I’m very glad that over the years people have watched this film with an optimistic eye and are able to get a deeper meaning out of the concept. I can easily agree that these reviews match the experience I took from watching this film as well. 

          There are only a couple of movies made in this world that you can label under a great/Top of the charts type of movie. I feel like having a consistent storyline where you’re being very persistent with the point that you’re trying to make, along with simplicity can complexity all mixed together is what makes a great film a great film. With the use of all these attributes, along with imagination, I feel like you have the capability to make any regular idea into an award winning movie. When I watched other great movies like ET and Forrest Gump you can also see the complexity, optimism, and imagination it took for them to create these great films with relatable meanings. Not only do the meanings have to be relatable but they need to be simple enough for someone with a 5th grade education to understand, but not in an oblivious type of way where it seems as if you may be talking to the audience in a “dumbed down” type of way.

          On a more technical level, I can say that I really enjoyed the audio and sound effects they used to create this film. I also liked the effort they put forth in order to create special effects in such an older type of movie. The actors worked really hard to give a realistic reaction to how scared they were of Kong and I couldn’t tell you how much I appreciate a good actor in a science fiction movie. In all I really enjoyed this film and recommend it 10/10 to my peers.

Forrest Gump Great Film

When someone says they’ve never watched Forrest Gump, people fall back, appalled. They can’t believe you’ve never seen the classic movie with Tom Hanks as main role. Honestly, I was 18 years old the first time I watched this film. I watched it with my two brothers, one which had already seen the film, my mom, and our dog. I couldn’t say I was too excited to see what the hype over this movie was because it didn’t really sound that interesting to me. Two long hours and 22 minutes later, I admit humbly my whole perspective had changed.  Truthfully, I can see why it is such a popular movie among American’s or really any humans that truly enjoy an underdog story. 

My overall experience with the movie was a very enjoyable. I think Tom Hanks really outdid himself as an actor. I have watched other movies with him such as: Saving Private Ryan and Sully. Both films, which I thought were great, and this movie is definitely my favorite. For being a movie that really didn’t seem to fit my genre, it was extremely intriguing, had me on the edge of my seat hoping he would get his dream girl and have the best life. 

The moments that stood out to me in this movie were the famous line “RUN FORREST RUN!” In this scene, Forrest is being pelted with rocks to his body and head. One rock specifically, made his head bleed. In this moment, Forrest is struggling to run on his own, he gets up and Jenny screams those famous words at him and Forrest begins to attempt to run away from the bullies as fast as he can. The bullies get on their bikes and begin to chase him. As their chasing him Forrest breaks out of his support and runs like the wind. The reason this moment stood out to me is because everyone would always say “Run Ty Run” in a voice that I didn’t understand when I was growing up. After this movie, I realized that this was where they had gotten it from. They were mocking Jenny’s voice, so it brought back memories from my childhood, and I felt like I could finally relate to the in crowd of Forrest Gump watchers. Apart from that, the deeper meaning was that beautiful scene where Forrest learns how to run. It was when he finally figured out his purpose and his passion. He claims in the movie, “If I was going somewhere, I was running.” It’s truly a feel good moment. 

Another scene that really stood out to me was when his friend “Bubba” died in the war. Forrest was always so committed and loyal to everything he did. When he lost his best friend it was truly heartbreaking. In the end, when you realize Forrest opened up the famous restaurant Bubba Gump, a place that I had eaten and never was able to make the connection it was even more meaningful. You realize what good and honest of a person Forrest is. It makes you wish only the best for him. 

What the critical conversations that I read all mostly agreed with my experience with the film. A lot matched my experience by claiming that the story of Forrest Gump is a story of love, hope, perseverance, respect, and tolerance. It was hard to find a critic that could disagree with that. 

Why I believe some films are considered “great” is because they teach us lessons, or have a deeper meaning, give us a good feeling. For instances, such as this one Forrest teaches us the importance of never giving up, and moving forward despite his past. The fact that he is honest, inspirational, and has good intentions he can be a motivational person for others. Another reason I believe films can be considered “great” is if they can be great to all different types of groups, not just one. For example, my favorite film The Blind Side is another underdog movie, about a kid who literally came from nothing to become an NFL star. Not only do athletes, as myself benefit from watching this, but a lot of people I know who aren’t athletes, not people of color, really enjoy this movie. I think it’s “great” because a lot of different people can agree it changed them in a way. Contrastingly, I think there are a lot of movies people claim to be “great” that really aren’t that great to me. I think that all has to do with opinion however. Not everyone likes the same thing. What a film critic might claim as “great, best, amazing” a regular movie goer might not agree. Everyone has different ideas to which they think great is. 

definitions week 1

The Studio System

Book definition:
“Under the studio system, the more of production that dominated American film making from the 1920s to the late 1940s, each move company signed most of its directors to long-term contracts, along with actors and other creative personnel.” (Sikov,120).

“The studio system operated under a mass-production model in which films were made and distributed like sausages or boxes of cereal, and there was not a lot of room for individual directors to put their personal stamp on films they made.” (Sikov, 121)

Resources:

1) Academic:
Author, Tom Schatz, writes in detail about the rise and fall of Hollywood’s studio system era. Before going in depth about the rise and fall, he explains the studio system. Essentially the studio system was a vertical integration of production, distribution and exhibition of films popularized between the 1920s and 1940s. Studios controlling all vertical factors of production established norms for the film industry. Essentially through the studio system, big studio names ;such as Warner Bros., or Paramount; followed production norms to mass produce films. In this system big studio heads contracted the same directors, production teams, and actors to uphold their label. The studio system followed a top-down system in which the executives controlled the business side of distribution and exhibition while producers oversaw the overall production of the film.

2) Journalistic
Writer, Ryan “R.L.” Terry, reveals that during the time of the “studio system”, there were five major film studios known as the Big Five, essentially controlling the film industry from production to distribution. These studios consisted of Paramount, MGM, RKO, Loew’s, Fox Pictures, and Warner Brothers. The studio system contained the collateral that big banks were looking for in order to invest in films, after all, film and television were and continues to be the United States’ largest exports even though they are only recently counted as part of the U.S.’ gross domestic product. The system would prevent independent filmmakers in expanding their creativity within projects and keep established positions in studios as permanent, limiting additional creatives to join the company. This limitation also applied to properties. In the days of the studio system, outside companies could not rent and shoot films or television shows on another company’s lot.

3) Personal
An article on the Hollywood lexicon describes the Hollywood studio system. An interesting take from this article was the allusion to the Ford Motor Company. The similarities between the Ford company and the studio system are not too shocking, but the fact this article touched upon this is good information. The article also goes in detail about the hardships non-studio system theaters went through in order to produce a film. An example of the studio system theaters power was the idea of “block booking”. Block booking was big studio names way of renting out their studios to second grade studios.
Through block booking non-established theaters were required to buy blocks of film that they had to produce on. Sometimes these packages included footage worth 20+ films. Needless to say the big 8 studios controlled over the film industry. More so this article talks about the use of stars to sell movies which created the notion of A-list movies or B-list movies based on who the actors were.

4) Vernacular
Author, Amelia Robinson, describes the studio system as a means of film production, distribution and exhibition dominant in Hollywood from the early 1920s through the 1950s. The term itself refers to the practice of large motion picture studios (1) producing their own filmmaking lots with creatives usually under long-term contracts and (2) proceeding a vertical integration through ownership of distributors and theaters, guaranteeing additional sales of films through manipulative booking techniques. A key part of the studio system was block booking, which entails them selling a year’s worth of films to the theatres that included a number of particularly attractive, big-budget films,
which would therefore, entice theatres to buy the whole block. Additionally, foreign films could not get a foothold in the U.S. unless they had arrangements with one of the Big 5 U.S. film companies.

Sources:
Academic:
http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/content/BPL_Images/Content_store/Sample_chapt
er/9781405133876/9781405133876_C01.pdf
(Links to an external site.)

Journalistic:
https://the-artifice.com/after-the-rise-and-fall-of-the-studio-system-could-we-use-it-today/

(Links to an external site.)

Personal:
http://www.hollywoodlexicon.com/studiosystem.html
(Links to an external site.)

Vernacular:

The Studio System


(Links to an external site.)

The Sound of Music and Family

The Sound of Music was released in 1965 and was produced and directed by Robert Wise in a form of a musical drama film. The film illustrates the way that music, lead by Maria, brings happiness back to the Von Trapp family and finally helps them escape from the powerful Nazis. By emerging music back into the family’s lives, Maria continues to convince people to understand that music has a mighty power to change even the most delicate situations into stronger family bonding and romantic feelings.

For the story of the Von Trapp family and of the events leading up to their concert attraction just prior to World War II and their fleeing from the Nazis, Wise in fact went to the actual locale, Salzburg, and spent 11 weeks filming his action among the pageantry of the Bavarian Alps. He caught the beauty and fascination of the terrain with his facile cameras, combining the gorgeous towering mountains and quiet lakes with the Old World grace of the historic City of Music, a great complement to interiors shot in Hollywood. One of the scenes that stood out was the sequence of the famous Salzburg Festival, which was actually shot in the spectacular Felsenreitschule, or Rocky Riding School. The stage of the vast amphitheatre is backgrounded by scores of arched tunnels carved out of the rocky mountain that surrounds the city and it forms an fantastic backdrop for the climactic scenes of the film, which then shows the Von Trapp family escaping after their appearance onstage while storm troopers are waiting for them in the audience.

There is no surprise that the music plays a huge narrative tool, but in also in corporation with wide shot visuals. This is especially shown when Maria made the children clothes from her window curtains and took them out into town. There is a long shot that audiences can see the beautiful mountains and the seven children all dressed in floral window drapes that shows, in hopes of the producer, the beauty in the family bonding in beautiful clothing within an open space in contrast to the uniforms their father insisted them to wear everyday inside the house. More interestingly, Maria then taught the children a music lesson on the seven keys – Do, Re, Mi, Fa, Sol, La, Ti. The Sound of Music purposely integrated this concept to show that each of the seven children have their own wider role in the family bond just as the seven keys of the music. When each of the keys take turns to sound or sound in harmony, they compose beautiful music all together.

Another pivotal scene that demonstrates this concept is in a later scene where the seven children form a choir to sing a ballad for their father’s potential suitor. The assembly of the children singing definitely was the catalyst in reminding Captain Von Trapp what peace music can bring. Using a medium shot, we see Captain Von Trapp’s emotional reaction to his children singing together in harmony. We then get a cutaway to the children singing, only to go back to Captain Von Trapp slowly entering the room to join the assembly. Within this sequence, the audience can see the father soften through the sound of music, which is something we have not seen before in the film until now. It does not even end there when we actually get to see the father play the guitar and sing to the children himself, embodying the bonding element Mariah always had with the children.

Despite all of the film’s stunning visual storytelling in family bonding, there were still however unforgiving critics who absolutely despised the beloved classic. It’s a historical context definitely added an extra intrigue to the Sound of Music phenomenon. Back in 1965, film critic Pauline Kael called The Sound of Music “the sugar-coated lie that people seem to want to eat.” She even goes on to say, “We have been turned into emotional and aesthetic imbeciles when we hear ourselves humming the sickly, goody-goody songs.” Many more harsh critics agreed with Kael. The New York Times’ Bosley Crowther’s initial review included calling out the film’s “cosy-cum-corny” direction and the plot’s “romantic nonsense and sentiment.” Soon after the film’s release, he posited that The Sound of Music would destroy the movie-musical genre, considering the excellence of West Side Story and My Fair Lady. 

It was more bitter than sweet to entangle my enjoyment watching the film with the harsh critics’ words during the time of the release but the musical continues to stand the test of time and touch many people’s hearts till this day.  Even if there are those who don’t see or feel the beauty of the film, at least they can hear the family sing the sound of music.

Sources:

https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3592972.pdf?ab_segments=0%252Fdefault-2%252Fcontrol&refreqid=excelsior%3Ab1aa3188e6eddcf7c8c3f6105aa0c1a1

https://www.thedailybeast.com/everyone-hated-the-sound-of-music?ref=scroll

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2018/may/17/the-sound-of-music-review-julie-andrews-christopher-plummer

The Sound of Zombies: How It’s More Than Just, “HNNNNNNNGGGHHHHH!!!”

Image result for night of the living dead

Romero’s Editing Strategies

Both editing strategies (continuity and analytical) are utilized to enhance the viewing experience for the audience. Continuity editing is used in most shots of the film but there are some analytical edited scenes spaced throughout the film as well.

The main match-on action scenes that occur during the movie are when a character would spot a zombie and you see the look of terror on their faces and then the shot switches to a clip of the zombie running towards that character to attack them. This occurs several times throughout the film as many characters are attacked. This type of editing is done to create suspense, when we see the look of horror on the character’s face then it leads the audience to wonder what they are going to see in the next scene which displays the zombies.

There was also some sparse analytical editing that occurred during the zombie attacks. The camera would show a close up of the character being attacked to make the shot more intimate and dramatic.

I think the director chose to shoot the film this way using both analytical and continuity editing because the film had a need for both. The setting plays a key role in the film as they are on a rural farm in Pennsylvania and the continuity editing shots help familiarize the audience with the setting. But the close up analytical shots help make the film more dramatic and engage the audience more.

Image result for zombie listening to music

Examples from the Film

To convey suspense and tension in the Night of the Living Dead, George A. Romero arouses expectations and subverts those expectations with uncertainty utilizing editing and sound. Around the 22-minute mark, Barbra surveys the house after a reassuring conversation with Ben. Ben’s consolation is not only received by Barbra within the parameters of the film, but Ben also consoles the audience—just enough words by Ben to put the audience at ease. As Barbra walks through a doorway, ominous music ramps up and takes away the comfort that Ben initially instills. Barbra fixates her vision towards something, using the music box as the variable for the transition. While the music box plays an innocent melody, a shot of Barbra with the music box out of focus parallels the dispatch to the audience of the focus towards Barbra.

Romero plays with the conjunction of editing and sound to convey to his audience the framework he placates. He juxtaposes the ominous theatrical music with the innocent melody of the music box. Romero constantly puts the audience in a disarray in where he simulates a roller coaster of tension subsequently subverting each other. Visually, Romero fixates on an inanimate object to impart to the audience where the focus should be. He displays Barbra focusing towards the music box and hinges conveying a tone with the object.

Oh! And Fun Fact…..

Other budget conflicts and the era in which the film was shot included shooting on a 35mm print, but only with 16mm editing equipment. The crew had to transfer all the footage to 16 mm before they could start editing it. Rousseau also notes that they rarely had time or a movie for more than one shot of any frame, and they did not have the opportunity to verify this. He had to believe that Romero was doing everything right. The sound was also mixed without seeing the picture.

Rousseau remembers the chess problem between Russell Streiner and the sound engineer in the laboratory. If Russ wins a chess game, they will receive a sound mix for free, but if he loses, they will have to pay twice as much. Some of the cast and crew watched the game, which Russ eventually won.