Pick Up on South Street: The Gist

Pick Up on South Street is a classic crime film.  The plot is centered around a pickpocket named Skip who unknowingly stole important films from a woman’s purse on the subway.  He believed he was just doing his typical pickpocket routine and was unaware that the films he stole contained scientific information meant to be given to Communists working against the United States.  The woman he stole from was under surveillance by a couple of detectives as they were trying to catch whoever she was supposed to deliver the films to.  

    Each character portrayed in the film was either a criminal, helping a criminal, or was law enforcement.  The woman with the films, Candy, didn’t know what she was delivering. However, her old boyfriend Joey was aware of the information and was having her deliver it to try and keep himself out of hot water.  Candy didn’t know that Joey was working with communists.    

    In the film, Candy is clearly the protagonist.  The entire plot line is centered around her actions to find the films and get them back.  Once she finds them it turns into her dealing with the consequences of interacting with dangerous people as well as doing illegal activities.  Skip is the antagonist as he thwarts Candy’s attempts to either find the films or buy them back from him. 

    The narrative of the story is done in chronological order from when the films are taken to when they are returned to the police.  It first shows Candy in the subway when she has her wallet stolen from her purse by Skip. Then it goes on to introduce the detectives that were following her and shows them bring in another character, Mo, to help them find the possible pickpocket.  Once the storyline gets rolling it switches back and forth between interactions with the cops and Skip, Candy telling Joey about the lost films, Candy finding Mo and then finding Skip, and eventually it all rounds back up to the detectives and finding the films.  The story is told in this way to keep the audience engaged with what’s going on. It also helps everything flow smoothly and make sense.

    The actors and actresses in the film did a great job playing their characters.  Candy and Skip, the protagonist and antagonist, seem to have an attraction to one another but they have different motivations behind the films.  Once Candy learned what was on the films she was horrified to know that she almost helped communists with an attack against her country. She was a very empathetic character.  Skip, however, was more concerned with the money aspect of the arrangement. He knew everything had a price and since the films were very valuable to someone he knew he could raise the price tremendously.  He didn’t seem to care much at all what he was selling, just that he benefited financially from it. 

    The actors chosen for the cast were somewhat well known.  Elizabeth Jean Peters, the woman that played Candy, had participated in A handful of films like Captain from Castile, It Happens Every Spring, and Deep Waters by the time she was cast for Pick Up on South Street.  Richard Widmark had also participated in a few movies before playing the part of Skip. He seems to have played in movies that were also dramas or action type movies. The importance of using the actors that they chose is that they know the actor will play the part really well.  Also, if the star is up and coming a studio probably saw them as a good investment opportunity for building fan bases in the future.  

Digital Filmmaking Definition

     Digital filmmaking is a relatively new art form that is changing the way movies around the world are created.  “Digital filmmaking” is an umbrella term for many different techniques used in films to digitally enhance the audio or visual effects.  These techniques are carried out with the use of special digital cameras, such as Sony’s HDVS video camera or the Arri Alexa, as well as various computer programs.  These computer programs allow images or audio to be completely digitally created. Some things that can be easily added in digitally are various environments or even full blown characters.  

 

     Digital filmmaking started to become popular sometime in the 1980s.  However, the first film that utilized digital filmmaking was Rainbow in 1996.  A Solid State Electronic Cinematography camera was used in the production and a good amount of the visual effects, editing, as well as sound effects were done digitally.

    According to journalists Adam Ganz and Lina Khatib in their article “Digital Cinema: The transformation of film practice and aesthetics” many film theorists find digital cinema to be highly controversial.  On one hand the use of digital technology revolutionized cinema by enhancing production methods, reducing costs, and reducing the amount of effort needed to create a movie. On the other hand it fundamentally changed the viewing perception of the audience as well as the level of difficulty for finding an audience.  By using digital cameras the footage can be stored digitally as well which greatly reduce costs. Before digital filmmaking all footage was kept on costly films that required dark rooms and temperature control. The process of turning the film into something usable was also tedious and expensive. The films themselves are expensive, highly flammable, and if not stored properly will decompose over time.  If something were to catch fire there could be an indefinite amount of damage done. According to Film Connection the actual physical film will begin to decompose over time. The celluloid used to make the films eventually turns into a mushy gel and everything on the original film ends up destroyed. Due to that unfortunate factor there are films that have been completely lost from improper protection.  

     Now with the use of digital technology editing and additions can be made in mere minutes.  There are special computer programs that allow filmmakers to put together multiple digital or audio files in order to composite one single file.  This creates a more seamless process as well as a safer process. The cost of the films made it difficult for filmmakers to work independently and oftentimes they would have to pair up with big studios that had the ability to invest in their movie.  Now with digital filmmaking anyone could make a clip and upload it to a platform such as YouTube and have it take off. This allows people of all socioeconomic statuses to make their way into the film industry. Before, you would have to have connections or a significant amount of money to produce a movie, but now it simply needs to go viral on a site like YouTube.  Youtube also monetizes the videos once a certain number of viewing hours has been hit. So someone with very little money could become viral and begin making decent amounts of money off of every view on YouTube.

 

Sources:

 

Ganz, Adam, and Lina Khatib. “Digital Cinema: The Transformation of Film Practice and Aesthetics.” New Cinemas: Journal of Contemporary Film, vol. 4, no. 1, 2006, pp. 21–36., doi:10.1386/ncin.4.1.21_1.

 

Mateer. “Digital Cinematography:Evolution of Craft or Revolution in Production?” Journal of Film and Video, vol. 66, no. 2, 2014, p. 3., doi:10.5406/jfilmvideo.66.2.0003.

 

“The New World of Digital Filmmaking.” Film Connection Film Institute, www.filmconnection.com/reference-library/film-entrepreneurs/the-new-world-of-digital-filmmaking-0411/.