Tokyo Story Reflection

I watched a classical Japanese movie Tokyo Story, which was directed by Yasujiro Ozu and released in 1953. The successful and great point of the film is that Ozu tells the audience the most common family story but reveals the deepest life principles with the simplest scenes and frames. The story describes a journey of an old couple to visit their sons and daughters who struggled for their life in Tokyo, but unexpectedly they received cold receptions and after their return to their hometown, the old mother died for illness. From the ordinary story and the simplest conversations among family members, I see the indifference of humanity; I understand the helplessness of human under the pressure of birth, death, illness, and death; I realize the loss of traditional values in the eastern world. In my opinion, this film worth watching over and over again for one can have fresh feelings every time you see it again.

There are many valuable scenes or moments in the film that should be studied and analyzed carefully. First, the obvious contrast between the indifferent attitude of the eldest son and daughter towards their old parents and the passionate welcome of their daughter-in-law whose husband had died for eight years shocks me a lot. In the homes of their natural son and daughter, the two old couple were treated as troubles and in order to avoid unnecessary issues, the two families together sent their parents to “enjoy” a sea journey, which left many uncomfortable feelings for the couple. However, Ji Zi, their daughter-in-law, acted very enthusiastic and filial and she actively chatted with them and never showed impatience. Second, the scene that Ji Zi chatted with the little daughter after the death of their mother is a very impressive and thought-provoking moment. In their conversations, the little daughter saw the attitudes of her old brothers and sisters towards their dead mother and her anger could not be hidden anymore, so she said that all of them were selfish. But Ji Zi answered surprisingly that one might become like that one day, and she would be also, because there were so many things in the world were unpleasant which may drive people to change to be someone they dislike or even hate. How helpless the words are. Undoubtedly all that she said were the truth and it is also the reason for the gradually bland world. What’s more, another scene stands out in the film is the final talk between Ji Zi and her father-in-law. Although her husband had gone for eight years, the idea of remarriage never occurred to her. She deeply kept in mind the status of a woman in a family and only when her father-in-law proposed her to remarry and forget her husband and begin a new life, did she feel relieved. The behavior of Ji Zi not only reflected her deep affection and faith, but indirectly showed her loss of individual identity under traditional ethics.

As for the critical conversations about this film, the prominent one is the controversy about the implications of the story. Lots of audience regard that the most important truth Ozu would like to tell is the indifference and unfilial actions of the sons and daughters, but some believe that there are more to find than that. Actually, people in different ages, with various experiences and from diverse places would have totally divergent thoughts every time they watch the movie. In my opinion, superficially, we can find that on the journey to their children’s home, the two old couple are treated perfunctorily and indifferently, but when we think of the deep reasons of this phenomenon maybe we can find the pressure from life and work, the elapse of time, and even the helplessness in one’s life are all causes of the tragedy. Just as Ji Zi said at the end of the film, everyone would become selfish and helpless as time went by, which is also the tragedy of the whole society.

What can be considered as a great film? What kind of great film is actually not good? Actually, in my view, there is more than one standard for us to evaluate whether a film is great or not. Take this film as an example, which I consider as a great one. All of the special effects, macro pictures, and even complicated plots are not found in the film, but the success of it relies on the profound truth the director tells the audiences with only a most common story, which contains unforgettable moments and scenes that can resonate with all audiences in different ages and backgrounds. So, we can conclude that not all great films are characterized by stunts, the most representative features of a great film are its connotations, everlasting taste for all audiences.

Sources

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2010/oct/20/tokyo-story-ozu-arthouse

https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2012/08/04/national/directors-vote-yasujiro-ozus-1953-tokyo-story-greatest-film-ever-made/

 

 

The Magic of Oz

The Wizard of Oz is one of the most beloved and critically acclaimed movie musicals, which was released under MGM in 1938. MGM wanted to produce an adaptation of L. Frank Baum’s children’s story, The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, determined to make a prestigious fantasy picture to rival Disney’s Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, which had premiered the year before (Rodman 128). Critical acclaim for the film was initially mixed. However, by the mid 1970s, the film had become firmly established in both scholarly and unscholarly American cultural discourse.

We follow an orphaned girl by the name of Dorothy Gale, who lives on a farm with her uncle, aunt and beloved dog, Toto. Only to be swept away by a tornado, up from the gray, impoverished lands of Kansas, landing in the magical land of Oz. At the cost of her arrival, Dorothy’s cabin causes the death of the Wicked Witch of the East, bringing much joy to the Munchkins but not so much to the Witch’s sister, the Wicked Witch of the West. With the only wish to go home and the help of the Good Witch of the North, Dorothy and Toto embark on a journey along the Yellow Brick Road, to find the Wizard of Oz himself in Emerald City. In the brink of her quest, Dorothy runs into and befriends three lovable individuals – a scarecrow who wants a brain, a tin man who yearns for a heart, and a lion who wishes for courage.

On the more technical side of things, camera techniques and special effects were crucial in creating the film. The videography of this film relies on many techniques but perhaps more heavily on the depth of field which is used to create a sense of relative space to each object in the setting. The rule of thirds is also used often to create mood and shift focus. Finally, this movie is infamous for its sounds. Both diegetic and non-diegetic sounds are used to create a sense of mood and and contrast. The Wizard of Oz uses filming elements including depth of field, the rule of thirds and non-diegetic sounds to establish the fantasy tone of the story. In addition to camera work, many physical production tools were utilized to bring the world of Kansas and Oz. For example, the tornado threatening Dorothy’s Kansas farmhouse was in fact a huge silk sticking twisted and coiling by a blowing fan. However, shots of the tornado at a far distance, seen in the film, used actual tornado footage. Another groundbreaking element to the film includes their considerable use of matte paintings. The most stunning example is the view of the Emerald City at the end of the Yellow Brick Road, as Dorothy and her group of friends finally arrive to see the Wizard of Oz.

One of the greatest elements of this film is not just the groundbreaking technology of color and music, but the themes around childhood that completely ground the characters and the world despite its whimsical features. The Wizard of Oz powerfully fills a void that exists inside many children. For kids of a certain age, home is everything, the center of the world if you will. But over the rainbow, is the wide earth, fascinating and terrifying. There is a deep fear that unpredictable events might occur after transporting the child from the safety of home and strand her or him far away in a strange land. And what would s/he hope to find there? New friends, to advise and protect them. New challenges, to educate and strength them. And their of course their pet dog, Toto as well.

The film’s theme touches on the key lesson of childhood – that someday the child will not be a child, that home will no longer exist, that adults will not be there to help because now the child is an adult and must face the challenges of life in the strange new land alone. But it also teaches you that you can always ask friends to help you. And that even the Wizard of Oz himself, the taunting “man” that every child fears in the new adult world, is only human, and has problems of his own.

The theme not only stops there but is critically portrayed within Dorothy’s friends on the Yellow Brick Road (the Tin Man, the Scarecrow, and the Lion). Her friends were projections of every child’s secret fears. Are we smart enough? What kind of person are we? Are we brave enough? Ultimately, in helping them, Dorothy was helping herself, just as a child who is learning the ropes of life overcoming their own fears by acting brave before another child.

This deep universal message explains why so many different people from many different backgrounds have a huge heart and treasured memory for The Wizard of Oz, including myself.

Sources:

https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/great-movie-the-wizard-of-oz-1939

https://www.filmsite.org/visualeffects5.html

https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24044541.pdf?ab_segments=0%252Fdefault-2%252Fcontrol&refreqid=excelsior%3A317a9a633ab885ef4a41e816b469e4b0

Snow White: Revolutionized Animation

A name and story we all know and love (maybe more so than others), Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs made its debut in 1937 and stands as the first princess story to kick off Walt Disney’s golden age of animation. Though it does not hold title as the first feature length animated film, it was a huge leap in the quality, technology, and story capabilities of animation till this day.

However, there was many skepticism surrounding the film even before its premiere. Snow White was so far ahead of the cartoons at the time that over its three year production period, many of the film critics then questioned if it was even possible to be made. In addition, there was a rising concern revolving around the audience’s interest. It was very rare to have an audience stay captivated in a cartoon story for more than an hour but this is where Walt changed the course and perspective of animated films. In order to keep the audience engaged, Walt knew they would need to have an emotional connection to the film the earlier cartoons were unable to produce. In order to do this, Walt needed to embrace Snow White with a sense of realism. Giving the audience the feeling that this was all happening to a real person who would think and feel, allowing them to empathize with Snow White and the seven Dwarfs all while retaining the charm and fairytale elements that comes from the unreal nature of animation. Almost all of the decisions in production was pointed to embody this balance, from the writing, character movements and designs, music, and effects.

After all of Walt and his team’s tireless efforts in producing the film, the story was released, following princess Snow White, who embodies all beauty, innocence, and above all, love. White charms every creature in the kingdom, including a prince, except one – her envious, vein stepmother, the Queen. Jealous of White’s innocence and youth along with the Magic Mirror’s proclamation of her as the “fairest of them all,” the Queen sends a huntsman to kill White. Unable to complete the task against the beautiful princess, the Huntsman implores White to flee in the forest only to return the heart of a pig to the Queen. In the midst of her run, Snow White finds herself in a cottage and befriends seven lovable dwarfs – Doc, Sneezy, Grumpy, Happy, Bashful, Sleepy, and Dopey. But when the Queen discovers the truth, she thus undergoes in disguise to trick innocent Snow White with an enchanted apple which puts her into a deep sleep, only with the magic of true love’s kiss to save her – from a prince possibly?

Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs was the first film to utilize the multi-plane camera, which allowed the background to give the impression of movement beyond simply side-scrolling, as was the standard at the time. It also made possible new types of special effects, such as the movements of water, and the flickering of the stars or light. The greatest example of this occurs after Snow White and the animals have finished cleaning the dwarfs’ cottage. How the camera pulls back to reveal a forest that hadn’t previously been in the frame. This is a simulated camera move, using the multi-plane camera. One can almost imagine the multi-plane camera pulling back (i.e. up) to achieve this shot.

But Team Disney didn’t stop there. They decided to fill the film with a number of sophisticated “directing” techniques. One of greatest directing techniques in Snow White comes during the wishing well scene and the introduction of Prince Charming. We start with a high angle shot looking down into the bottom of the well, seeing Snow White’s reflection in the well water. Suddenly, Prince Charming appears behind her — in a reflection — to finish the verse of her song, “I’m Wishing” with a rousing, “Today!!” The pacing and coordination of the whole sequence conveys the essence of fate in a fairytale narrative while keeping the realistic visuals of a live action.

Another great example includes the Queen’s transformation. How the room spins around the Queen as she takes the magic potion and transforms into the witch. With the use of the multi-plane camera, we get a three-dimensional visual which creates its own form of horrifying, disorienting vertigo.

In conjunction of the realism bestowed on the characters and designs with the advanced technology of the multi-plane camera, Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs revolutionized storytelling within not only the animation realm, but in all of cinema. Of all the innovations that Disney has brought to animation, this is the one that changed everything. The emotional response to the film, then and now, is the reason why an audience can sit for over an hour and become completely absorbed in a magical world. Because no matter how fantastic and extravagant the art is, the story is grounded to the same reality that effects you and me.

Sources:

https://thefilmspectrum.com/?p=18800 

https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26446669.pdf?ab_segments=0%252Fdefault-2%252Fcontrol&refreqid=excelsior%3Ad233582c0b461cdd426122f7b36d7781 

http://screenprism.com/insights/article/how-did-the-multiplane-camera-invented-for-snow-white-and-the-seven-dwarfs 

“Vertigo”-A confessional trip

Vertigo (1958) is Hitchcock’s another great film that is characteristic of tricks, suspense, and murder. Compared to Hitchcock’s horror film Night of the Living Dead (1968), Hitchcock does not make this film a visual-based horror genre but a mixture of psycho, art, and technique. Honestly, this film has allowed me to experience both a bright and dark side of humanity in a mysterious atmosphere. We see Madeleine’s husband Gavin has made an elaborate murder plan to kill his wife to get his inheritance. Through making up a series of fake stories to prove Madeleine’s mental illness and hiring a woman looking like Madeleine, Gavin makes his intentions of killing Madeleine visible to the audience. However, when all things for the murder plan are well planed, Hitchcock seems to create some unexpected stories to add the sense of vertigo by featuring Scottie’s falling obsession with Madeleine. Not guided by the ideas about the so-called weird behaviors of Madeline, Scottie follows her and saves her. Hitchcock creates the plot of Scottie’s romanticism and passionate love with Madeline to feature the bizarre situation of their romanticism. That has made me think a lot of techniques used in other psychological thriller genre films.

One scene stood out of the who movie is when Scottie brings Judy to the Bell Tower where Madeleine died. In this scene, Scottie forces Judy to confess her crime behavior and tell whether Madeline is alive not not. It is set inside of the tower and Hitchcock gives a low-key lighting throughout the scene that makes the face and body of the characters not that clearly to be seen. This creates a sense of tension for the plot that hooks the audience to predicate what will happen between Scottie and Judy. In this scene, the shots are also frequently given to the staircase while Scottie is struggling to go to the top of the tower. This has well offered us a visual symbol of Scottie’s mental instability. But he made it, this made the audience to sense the narrowly escape of Scottie from the bad fortune while he has witnessed the death of Judy. Hitchcock has hidden a lot of invisible clues in this staircase scene to connect his lust and the shock of both Madeleine and Judy’s death at the same place.

As the title has implied, Hitchcock has employed a lot of shots that give the audience of a sense of vertigo. The effects of vertigo are not given as what most people have expected the rapid whirl, but rather through giving an intense focusing. This can be witnessed from the title sequence of this movie. Also, the beginning scene that Scottie is struck in the rooftop chase, the shots of Scottie’s facial expressions and the floor have paved a good way resonating with the title sequence as well as the title of the film “Vertigo”. Another key scene gives a sense of vertigo is when Judy emerges as Madeline in the house. The ghostly green miasma around the door makes her luminosity kind of blinding for the audience. This resonates with the title of the film implicitly.

Peter Bradshaw in a post from The Guardian has discussed, “Vertigo also combines in an almost unique balance Hitchcock’s brash flair for psychological shocks with his elegant genius for dapper stylishness.” This critic of this film makes the audience to reread the subtle relationships between the superficially luxurious look and guilty of an immoderate lust and sex in a psycho model. To a large extent, it helps me learn how Hitchcock makes a blonde’s appearance and psychological obsession is mutually connected.

What makes this film has much to do with the use of actors and actresses, the Hollywood classical zooming and 180-degree rule, and the mise-en-scene. Novak both play Madeleine and Judy throughout this Hitchcock film. Her look and costumes transfer over and over through the luxurious scarlet of Ernie’s Restaurant from the beginning to a jarring market with flowers, Hitchcock has crafted her perspectives on the direction of the storyline in a skillful way. Most interestingly, this film is more likely to psychologically thrill the audience by featuring the well-planned murder of Madeleine and Madeleine and Judy’s death at the tower. The themes of crime, sex, and lust are mixed together without blurring the boundaries between the characters. This is one of the best psychological thriller films Hitchcock has made that has heavily affected my ways of appreciating a psychological thriller film in American industry.

 

Bradshaw, Peter. “Vertigo Review-still spinning its dizzying magic.” theguardian. Retrieved from

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2018/jul/12/vertigo-review-alfred-hitchcock-james-stewart-kim-novak

https://www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/vertigo-the-search-for-a-cure

The Silence of the Lambs 1991

The Silence of the Lambs 1991

The Silence of the Lambs is a thriller film directed by Jonathan Demme in 1991. This film is starred by Jodie Foster, Anthony Hopkins, and Scott Glenn. In the film, a young FBI trainee Clarice went to a prison to visit Dr. Hannibal, a psychiatrist, in order to find out the clue of a serial killer “Buffalo Bill” who cruelty skin female victims’ corpses. Hannibal gave Clarice some clues, and finally, Clarice found the bison Bill and killed him. In 1992, it won the 64th Academy Awards for best picture, best actor, best actress, best director, and best-adapted screenplay.

The first shot is the dense forest, fallen leaves, and thick fog. The lights of the film were dim. This is a daytime scene, but the natural light during the day is obscured by fog. Then the shot starts to roll down from high. The protagonist runs into the picture from the perspective and runs from the perspective to the close-range, a long shot. Such a slow-paced lens effectively sets off the atmosphere at this time and the basic tone of the whole film. The open and cold forests make people feel uneasy. The protagonist runs in such a forest to show her character or life: she works hard, at the same time she is lonely. Then the camera focuses on the protagonist and the rhythm is suddenly accelerated so that the audience feel the protagonist’s perseverance and competitiveness. Long shots and scenes here have successfully shaped the heroine’s character and laid the groundwork for the subsequent plot development. The protagonist sweats a lot, wearing the school uniform of FBI College and constantly brushing past the detective in suit and leather shoes. Visually, it is obvious that the difference in dress and state, highlighting the identity of the protagonist. In addition, the protagonist does not know why the chief officer wants to see her. this strong visual contrast also creates a sense of tension or depression (THR Staff).

In the scene from 48’ 47’’ to 49’45’’, the director uses a about one minute long full-length shot to show the killer’s home. Because the time shown by the long lens is the same as the time actually watched by the audience, the audience seems to be in the murderer’s house when the lens walks. This shot shows the murderer’s home while increasing the audience’s curiosity about him. This scene has been accompanied by music and a female voice tearing shouting. After a second or two, the camera moves slowly to the right, and the transformed butterfly enters the lens. Next, the lens pulls back. The lens is like a human eye looking around, knife, female model! Cold, gloomy, dark, crowded, chaotic is the summary of what we see. The use of this lens makes the audience feel more truly the atmosphere of terror and tension. When the lens reached the end again, the direction was forced to shift. The murderer ‘s back constituted the visual center of the picture. His snow-white body was very conspicuous in the cold tone. The camera kept pushing forward, trying to get close to the murderer, but as we were about to see what the murderer was doing, a dog diverted our eyes and followed him to a deep well, where we were gradually approaching the scream. But the director apparently didn’t want us to see the desperate figure of the girl in the well. The camera stayed at the edge of the dry well, because the right to solve the mystery was left to the next news. Viewers have a desire to see what’s happening, and if they don’t, they feel fear, tension or mystery. This setting arouses the curiosity of the audience and leaves room for further plot development. Besides, it allows the audiences to clearly know the surrounding environment and even things outside the scene in the shortest possible time by setting the design but also can show the reaction of the surrounding people and the subjective state of mind. Most importantly, the camera setting creates successfully an atmosphere of suspense and dread.

 

Sources

Wikipedia contributors. “The Silence of the Lambs (film).” Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, 2 Jun. 2019. Web. 3 Jun. 2019.

THR Staff. “The Silence of the Lambs’: THR’s 1991 Review”. Hollywood Reporter. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/silence-lambs-review-1991-movie-1084731 February, 14, 2018. Web. June 2, 2019.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0102926/

Citizen Kane 1941

Citizen Kane 1941.

Citizen Kane is a documentary film made by Orson Welles in 1940. The film opens with a newspaper tycoon dying alone in his mansion and follows his extraordinary life through the words “rosebud”.

In the film “Citizen Kane”, the information flows through the reporter Thompson. As this reporter interviews Kane’s friends, cooperators, and ex-wife, the causality and relationships between characters are gradually unfolded. The narration in this film is unrestricted. we know more information than any character in the film. We know the causes and effects of the story. At the beginning part, our sight along with the camera over the words “No Trespassing” and iron fence goes into Kane’s castle. We watched Kane’s death, his last words “Rosebud”, and the scene crystal ball falling down from his hand. Characters in the film may only know one side of Kane’s life, but with unrestricted narration, we the audience know different versions of Kane’s life story.

The stories recounted by other characters about Mr. Kain are reflective of their own opinion and how they are. For example, Thompson visits Leland who used to be Kane’s good friend. Leland describes Kane as a person lived by his power and a poor newspaperman. From Leland’s narration, we know Kane’s unhappy marriages. It also reflects Leland’s disagreement with Kane’s operation principle in his career and disappointment towards Kane life attitude. Another example is Susan who used to be the wife and lover of Kane. When the reporter found Susan, he was rejected to have an interview. Along with her telling, we gradually know that she has suffered from marriage. In some sense, she hates Kane.

The narrations of those characters reveal who Mr’Kain is. Their understanding of what kind of person Kane is is just from their own perspective, not a comprehensive and overall version of Kane. Each character has different experiences and interactions with Kane. Their recounts of Kane are largely affected by personal emotions.

 

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0033467/

https://www.warnerbros.com/citizen-kane

https://www.rogerebert.com/rogers-journal/a-viewers-companion-to-citizen-kane

REAR WINDOW (1954)

REAR WINDOW (1954)

The rear window is a mystery thriller suspense film directed by Alfred Hitchcock in 1954. Rear Window is one of the representative works of Hitchcock’s suspense films. He creates an atmosphere of terror and suspense and vividly explores everyone’s hidden peeping psychology. Photojournalist Jeffery broke his leg

in an accident, so he was confined to his wheelchair for some time. Be free and at leisure’s Jeffery always liked to watch his neighbors through his window. During this period, he observed various stories of his neighbors and witnessed a murder.

In terms of plot structure, the film consists of three stories. First, the love story between the photographer Jeffrey and her girlfriend, the beautiful, gentle and wealthy girlfriend wants to get married, while the poor, lazy and adventurous Jeffrey wants to keep the status quo. There is an irreconcilable contradiction between the two. Second, the neighbors of Jeffrey. All of them are good movies, disappointed but talented composers, beautiful but vain dancers, miss Lonely Fangxin who longs for love but can’t get it. Three: Family murder, the film simply explained the reasons, but the story has been passive, but even so it also contains all the elements of a good film. Almost all the scenes in the film are peeping lenses, which are contacted with the eyes of others.

In addition, the film also is characterized by long shot. The film begins with a long lens, showing audiences all kinds of information including the hero’s leg was in plaster and he had a telescopic camera. The function of the long lens is to give the audience a god’s perspective. When the audience sees the whole picture of the object, they get rid of the dual limitations of time and space. The director takes the actor’s eyes as the lens, prying into the lives of his neighbors. The audience gradually sees a murder surface with the hero’s eyes, but the murder is not the whole movie, it is just a movie in this movie. In this movie, every window is a screen, and every moment is a movie.

This movie doesn’t have any real bloody scenes, but it shows the audience a lot of interesting details, such as suitcases, flower beds, dogs, specific scenes and time, lighting contrast, including the life scenes of each neighbor, all of which make the audience feel real.

 

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0047396/

http://mentalfloss.com/article/84880/12-thrilling-facts-about-rear-window

https://www.theguardian.com/film/filmblog/2012/jul/25/my-favourite-hitchcock-rear-window

Great Film 2-The Sound of Music (1965)

The Sound of Music (1965)

The Sound of Music is an American musical drama film in 1965 and directed by Robert Wise. This film is considered as one of the most exceptional films in the mid-1960s. Besides, this film represents the climate of Hollywood musicals.  In the play, the heroine Maria is singing incessantly, which is her yearning for freedom and pursuit of happiness and happiness. This film narrates a story that a nun Maria came to retired naval officer Captain Georg’s house to work as a private teacher. She soon became popular with the children. Captain Georg gradually fall in love with Maria.

This film won the best picture award, best director award, best editing award, best sound award and best score award at the Academy Awards in 1965, which are still regarded as the gods of song and dance films. Music not only depicts the characters, sets off the atmosphere, but also plays an important role in promoting the plot.

In his film, music is very successful in depicting characters’ psychology, setting off the environment and atmosphere, and promoting the plot development. Music plays an irreplaceable role in the process of film development. Music popular tune is easy to be more accepted and recognized, and the art form of music makes the film to express feelings more deeply in people’s hearts, causing strong resonance of people, finally make the film music function is fully reflected.

 

 

https://journals.equinoxpub.com/index.php/JFM

https://www.filmsite.org/soun.html

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2018/may/17/the-sound-of-music-review-julie-andrews-christopher-plummer

 

 

Film Analysis Essay 1 The Wizard of Oz (1939)

Film Analysis Essay 1 The Wizard of Oz (1939)

The little girl named Dorothy lives with her aunt and uncle on a farm in central Kansas. One day, the tornado hit, in order to find her beloved dog, Dorothy was not able to hide in time. A powerful tornado swept Dorothy’s cabin into the air. After some time, the hut finally fell to the ground and killed an evil witch. Below the guidance of kind-hearted north witch, Dorothy and her dog set out for wizard oz the emerald city that lives, pray he can help him go home. On the way, Dorothy meets a scarecrow, a tin man and a lion who have no brains.

This film is one of the most popular musical adventure films in MGM. One of the most important reasons why this movie is a classic is that it shows a kind of rite of passage. And it was played every year at Christmas and Easter. Despite the technological backwardness of the 1930s, this fantasy film is a timeless classic. The reasons are as follows:

  1. The rare color film in those days. For us to create a magnificent fairy tale world.
  2. The beautiful music and Judy’s rich infectious voice. The song “Over the Rainbow” has been covered many times since, but I can’t think of any other version that compares to Judy’s original.
  3. “classic educational story. “There is no place like home.”

In addition to the comparison of characters and scenes, the constant repetition and variations of music theme always emphasize the changes of Dorothy’s emotions, and the same music theme also helps to unify the story in a unified style.

In terms of content, characters Dorothy met representing different meanings, such as the lion without courage, the tin man without heart, the scarecrow without wisdom, and the witch of the east with love and the witch of the west with evil. Dorothy is determined to run away from home for her dog, away from the aunts and uncles who raised her, ignoring the fact that she has a warm home and wants to go to a more perfect place. But every corner of the world where there will be a perfect place to send the existence. Oz, although there is a full of love little person and love the witch, but she also met a defective lion, tin man, scarecrow, she was in love like to go to the mage with three to get the courage, heart, wisdom, but they are not all the way all goes well, there will be full of evil witch to rock the boat, although they upset their lack of wisdom has the courage to love, but when Dorothy was a witch, when to go to catch them in order to save Dorothy, but showed remarkable courage, wisdom and love.

The mainframe of the story is that Dorothy dreamed that she was transported to Oz by a whirlwind. After meeting many friends on her way home, she solved some difficulties and successfully returned to her home in Kansas, only to find that she was just having a dream. That story is the standard of A – B – A – oz – Kansas (Kansas) type structure, the change of the color (black and white – color – black and white) also shows that this structure, the black and white (Kansas) and color (oz), the specific content of the story are filled in the framework of this big, thus creates A complete story.

https://www.filmsite.org/wiza.html

https://daily.jstor.org/consumerism-and-the-wizard-of-oz/

https://www.ahschools.us/cms/lib08/MN01909485/Centricity/Domain/818/Grade%2012%20Economics/oz.html

 

The Misogyny of Ball-Busting

Gangster films represent a film genre that is often critically acclaimed. It displays gangsters, more often than not in an objective lens. Creators tend to portray a crime-induced life to steer away from. However, at times, the discourse of the crime film narrative is often sexist and inaccurate.

In a New York Post, Kyle Smith proclaims that “Women are not capable of understanding GoodFellas.” With an overt generalization, Smith ironically displays on how he, himself, did not comprehend Martin Scorcese’s GoodFellas. He reasons with the “wiseguys never have to work (…) doing what guys love above all else: sitting around with the gang, busting each other’s balls.” Fittingly enough, Smith also did not have to lift a finger in the level of thinking in digesting Scorcese’s film. Scorcese’s portrayal of “busting each other’s balls” and the male gangster camaraderie  is a precedent to the eventual downfall of the perceived close-knit brotherhood. In the end, Henry Hill breaks one of the primary rules of the mob: do not snitch on each other, so the idea that this exemplifies trust and brotherhood in a positive connotation falls apart with knowing how Henry turns out. In retrospect, the comedic relief of “cheerfully insulting one another” is the superficial shield to the insecurity that is masculinity (Smith). The men insult one another as if to display that nothing pierces their facade—a masturbation of each other’s egoes. 

But when this framework gets infiltrated by an outsider, the gang’s insecurity shows its fragility. In the infamous Billy Bats scene, Billy comments on Tommy’s old ways of shining shoes. Tommy overreacts with violent anger going as far as “whacking” Billy Bats. Smith describes Billy’s comments as “improper ball-busting.” The lines who can insult or not in the mob are arbitrary. It is merely an excuse to draw lines between “us against them,” which is the whole premise of a gang. Tommy displays how fragile his ego is when he assumes that the comment was an insult, but as Smith describes in his article, insults are often done “cheerfully” (Smith).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pQ6fd6iO_c

In opposition, in the scene where Henry exclaims of how Tommy is funny, Tommy teases and intimidates Henry of acting like he is insulted by the remark. The gang laughs it off that Tommy completely intimidates Henry, a harmless jab by two comrades. But, Scorcese carefully places a line Tommy says in the end, “I worry about you sometimes, Henry. You may fold under questioning.” The harmless joke turns out to be a foreshadowing of the downfall of the mob.

Smith makes the comparison of the GoodFellas to Sex and the City, and how the women in the critically acclaimed HBO TV show tend to bring up their personal problems; therefore, the men in GoodFellas are superior for not letting this poison Smith’s love for the bustings of the balls. However, the demise of the gang stems for the suppression of the information towards each other. Their lack of communication ends up being their downfall and mistrust with each other—along with the use of cocaine. A prime example of the effect of how the toxic masculinity that Smith seems to be so eagerly glorify is how Henry Hill ends up telling all. Because of the suppression of what Smith perceives as feminine qualities, Henry eventually comes to a rupture. Smith also presents the relationship between Karen and Henry to be that of exemplary ball-busting marriage. Smith states, “[Karen] promises to keep the party going” implying another form of suppression through the tough times. If Karen keeps the party going even with the DEA completely at Henry’s tails, Smith completely misses the point of the dangers of suppressing the inevitable.

The argument of ball-busting being a harmless promotion of the masculine ethos misses the fact that the demise of the  GoodFellas is what Scorcese wants to convey to the audience. Most of the film’s runtime involves the good times of the mob—how their camaraderie kept the ship afloat, so Smith’s comprehension of the events seems to leave out the ending. Ironically, the aspect he glorifies the most is the root cause of their demise. Gangster films are ultimately great, but the discourse around it seems to be inaccurate with the people that it is written for merley confirms their misogyny. Smith exudes of the male hubris Scorcese attempts to steer him away from. Sadly, he is just not capable of understanding the GoodFellas. Sorry, Kyle!

Sources

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7e9d/3db2be6a0b29b17933348d04490adc350297.pdf

https://nypost.com/2015/06/10/sorry-ladies-youll-never-understand-why-guys-love-goodfellas/

https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/goodfellas-1990